Burnley private landlord’s unsafe homes land him with large fine at Preston Magistrates' Court

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
A private landlord who let three of his properties fall into dangerous disrepair has been ordered to pay almost £14,000 after a court case brought by Burnley Council.

Preston Magistrates’ Court heard that David Waddington allowed vulnerable tenants to live in conditions that potentially caused a risk to their health and safety.

These included damp and mould, exposed electrical hazards, holes in the ceiling, excessive cold, and fire risk.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Waddington promised that essential repairs would be carried to the properties in Padiham, but in reality only carried out minor improvements and didn’t rectify the main issues of concern.

Burnley Town Hall. Photo: Kelvin StuttardBurnley Town Hall. Photo: Kelvin Stuttard
Burnley Town Hall. Photo: Kelvin Stuttard

Waddington, whose last known address was in Pendleton, Clitheroe, admitted three offences of breaching improvement notices under the Housing Act 2004. He was fined £3,840 per property (a total of £11,520) and ordered to pay a £2,000 victim surcharge and £450 in costs.

A council spokesperson said: “After almost two years’ of investigation and serving legal notices on the landlord, we’ve finally seen some kind of justice for his tenants.

“They were all vulnerable in one way or another and were forced to live in such poor conditions that you could see the effect it was having on their health and well-being.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“The vast majority of private landlords care about the conditions their tenants live in and do their best to look after them. The message needs to get out that Burnley Council won’t tolerate those poor landlords that don’t care about their tenants and the sometimes appalling conditions they are forced to live in. We don’t want them in our borough.”

Read More
Police close part of Manchester Road in Burnley due to collapsed culvert

The court was told that council officers initially visited one of the properties after complaints were raised. The poor state of the house caused council officers to look at other properties owned by Waddington and similar issues were found in the other two houses.

Waddington was told to carry out repairs on each of the three properties but on return visits the officers found only relatively minor work had been carried out and there were still outstanding issues. He was subsequently served with improvement notices to carry out essential work on all the properties.

The court heard that Waddington had been given ample time to comply with the improvement notices but failed to do so. Some work was completed but major issues were left outstanding.